menu ☰
menu ˟

Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank

Tiny URL:

This page can be referred to using the following tiny url:


Brembs, B. and Munafo, <

Subject Keywords: Open Access publishing
Type: Article
Region: International (other)

Most researchers acknowledge an intrinsic hierarchy in the scholarly journals (‘journal rank’) that they submit their work to, and adjust not only their submission but also their reading strategies accordingly. On the other hand, much has been written about the negative effects of institutionalizing journal rank as an impact measure. So far, contributions to the debate concerning the limitations of journal rank as a scientific impact assessment tool have either lacked data, or relied on only a few studies. In this review, we present the most recent and pertinent data on the consequences of our current scholarly communication system with respect to various measures of scientific quality (such as utility/citations, methodological soundness, expert ratings or retractions). These data corroborate previous hypotheses: using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice. Moreover, the data lead us to argue that any journal rank (not only the currently-Favoured Impact Factor) would have this negative impact. Therefore, we suggest that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system, will ultimately be necessary. This new system will use modern information technology to vastly improve the filter, sort and discovery functions of the current journal system.






Rights: © The Authors
Suggested citation:

Brembs, B. and Munafo, <. (2013) Deep Impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank [Online]. Available from: [Accessed: 20th February 2017].


View your saved citations and reading lists


Other partner websites
Click here to view all the resources gathered from this organisation's website.



Altmetrics are currently not available for this resource.